tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4137286492913353309.post30762295607318586..comments2023-09-04T11:42:55.289+02:00Comments on Bubbleview: UEFA pass financial rules for clubsJoppe -http://www.blogger.com/profile/09661438911950838399noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4137286492913353309.post-36207836146288840192009-09-17T20:12:00.123+02:002009-09-17T20:12:00.123+02:00But obviously it would be possible to put private ...But obviously it would be possible to put private money into the clubs. Just call it shirt sponsor money or whatever. There will be zillions of more intricate ways to get around that.<br />I think the main problem would be to find someone that wants to. Much easier to find a BG/Frazier/Hicks kind of a person and in that way it likely cement things.<br />In some way finance an increase in stadium capacity could be another way to grow, granted that the clubs sell tickets (wich, I know, is doubtful at the moment). That was one of the original thoughts when BG took over.Joppe -https://www.blogger.com/profile/09661438911950838399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4137286492913353309.post-20035708170761607112009-09-17T19:05:42.099+02:002009-09-17T19:05:42.099+02:00Joppe:
And it seems like that´s what they did at L...Joppe:<br />And it seems like that´s what they did at Liverpool and ManUre to when new owners bought the clubs? <br /><br />If you´ll only be able to spend what you generate than it´d be quite difficult to spend private money one would think. Though I don´t know what they have in mind on this one.<br /><br />I´m looking forward to your further penetration of the subject. :-)<br /><br />Hakan:<br />That was my first thought as well.PLnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4137286492913353309.post-31568934337830251672009-09-17T11:53:59.965+02:002009-09-17T11:53:59.965+02:00PL:
In my ignorance I can’t see why private money ...PL:<br />In my ignorance I can’t see why private money can’t be invested in the clubs. What it may prevent though, is the pretty common situation were a new owner say they put money in the clubs but actually they only set up and provide security for another loan.<br /><br />Wich is exactly what BG did in West Ham.<br /><br />Need to study this further when the fine print is available.Joppe -https://www.blogger.com/profile/09661438911950838399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4137286492913353309.post-41366017570501438602009-09-16T13:45:40.179+02:002009-09-16T13:45:40.179+02:00These rules are supposed to be implemented in the ...These rules are supposed to be implemented in the interest of financial stability, but the way I see it they are in fact designed to protect the dominant positions of the leading clubs. If clubs are not allowed to spend more than their income it will be virtually impossible for new clubs to break inte the top echelons, as Chelsea have done in recent years and City are now trying to do.Hakanhttp://hakanrylander.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4137286492913353309.post-57592057770904749752009-09-16T12:47:00.910+02:002009-09-16T12:47:00.910+02:00A couple of questions arise when I read about this...A couple of questions arise when I read about this. I don´t know if you´re able to answer them but anyway... :-)<br /><br />Does this mean that the times when owners can buy success due to their own fortune is over? If funds generated by the clubs are the only money you could spend on players and salaries that wouldn´t be possible, right?<br /><br />One more thing is how they´ll consider debts? There´s a lot of teams with far more debts than West Ham. What´ll happen to them?PLnoreply@blogger.com